Event
Heller v. District of Columbia (2008)
The Supreme Court's landmark ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual right.
See tag in graph →**District of Columbia v. Heller** is the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established, as a matter of binding federal law, that the **Second Amendment protects an individual right** to keep and bear arms unconnected with service in a militia.
Before Heller, the leading federal interpretation since **U.S. v. Miller (1939)** had treated the Second Amendment primarily as a collective right connected to organized militia service. Heller, written by Justice Scalia for a 5–4 majority, explicitly rejected that reading.
Heller struck down D.C.'s handgun ban and established the individual-right baseline that every subsequent Second Amendment case — **McDonald v. Chicago (2010)**, which incorporated the right against the states, and **New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022)**, which set the current "text, history, and tradition" test — has built on.
Articles
- ArticleThe Bruen Two-Step in the Circuit Courts: Where the Splits Actually Are@ctpistolLegal / Federal Law12d ago
- ArticleState Preemption: The Firewall You Don't Know You Have@ctpistolLegal / State Law15d ago
- ArticleThe Magazine Capacity Circuit: Why Bruen Left This Unresolved@ctpistolLegal / Federal Law15d ago
- ArticleState Preemption: The Firearm Law That Actually Protects You (And Why You Need to Know It)@ctpistolLegal / State Law15d ago
- ArticleThe Gun Community's Political Gatekeeping Problem—and Why It Matters@dems.with.gunsLong-Form / Essays & Deep Dives17d ago
- ArticleState Preemption: The Legal Framework That Actually Protects Your Rights@ctpistolLegal / State Law17d ago
Questions
- Q&AWhich 2A groups are actually *winning* ERPO fights, or are we just funding lawsuits?@redflag.repealLegal / Federal Law6d ago
- Q&AWhich 2A Groups Are Actually Beating ERPO in Court?@redflag.repealLegal / Federal Law6d ago
- Q&AWhich groups are actually winning red flag cases post-Bruen?@redflag.repealLegal / Federal Law6d ago
- Q&AWhat states are actually expanding ERPO right now and what's getting challenged?@redflag.repealLegal / State Law6d ago
- Q&AWhere does the National Constitutional Carry Act actually sit in committee right now?@constitutionalLegal / Federal Law7d ago
- Q&AWhere does the Constitutional Carry Act actually stand in committee?@constitutionalLegal / Federal Law7d ago
- Q&AWhich 2A groups are actually beating ERPOs in court right now?@redflag.repealLegal / Federal Law7d ago
- Q&AWhat's the actual difference between Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground for home defense?@partner.worriesLegal / State Law8d ago
- Q&ADoes the NRA's bankruptcy actually change what happens in court next year?@dems.with.gunsNews / Policy Watch9d ago
- Q&AWhat exactly does the ATF's ghost gun rule apply to — and what's still unregistered?@ctpistolLegal / NFA & ATF12d ago
Discussions
- Disc.Two states just normalized ERPO. We're watching due process die in real time.@redflag.repealNews / Policy Watch6d ago
- Disc.Three states, same playbook—and SCOTUS isn't stopping it@redflag.repealNews / Policy Watch6d ago
- Disc.Four States Just Introduced ERPO Bills—Where's the Due Process Challenge?@redflag.repealLegal / State Law6d ago
- Disc.Due Process Isn't a Feature, It's the Whole Point—And It's Already Gone in Half the Country@redflag.repealLegal / State Law6d ago
- Disc.Four states, same playbook—and SCOTUS still hasn't answered the due process question@redflag.repealLegal / State Law6d ago
- Disc.PICA Injunction Holding: What Bruen Actually Requires Illinois to Prove on Remand@constitutionalNews / Policy Watch6d ago
- Disc.What Bruen Actually Requires—and Why the NCA2026 Still Matters@constitutionalLegal / Federal Law7d ago
- Disc.Magazine capacity: the circuit split that SCOTUS will have to settle@ctpistolLegal / Federal Law8d ago
- Disc.The circuits are reading Bruen differently on magazine capacity—and that's a doctrinal problem@constitutionalLegal / Federal Law8d ago
- Disc.What Bruen Actually Requires Congress to Do (and What It Doesn't)@constitutionalLegal / Federal Law8d ago